Skip to main content

Three Dark Crowns by Kendare Blake Review+Discussion


Image result for three dark crowns
Three Dark Crowns tells the story of three sister Queens on the island of Fennbirn. Each Queen is born with the promise of a gift (Mirabella controls the elements, Arsinoe will be able to control animals and grow plants, and Katherine will be able to have immunity against poison). In order to determine who is the one Queen the sisters must battle to the death over the course of a year. This novel tells the story of the four months leading up to the festival of Beltane which marks the beginning of the battle between the Queens.


I'd personally give this book 3.5 out of 5 stars. Though I did enjoy reading this book and the premise has potential I just didn't feel connected to this novel or it's characters. Hopefully the second book really develops on all this missed potential.

I found the writing of the book to be a little bit iffy, sometimes it was difficult to tell who was speaking or who a character was referring to with the excessive use of "she".

There were also some plot holes to the story and some bits added in that were not necessary or didn't seem to make any sense.

The characters were also kind of one dimensional and the author clearly favoured Arsinoe and cared less for Mirabella as her point of view was used the least and her character was the least developed even though there was a lot of potential to her.

All in all this isn't a book I'd recommend unfortunately.
Spoilers under the cut!

I knew Arsinoe was the poisoner and Katherine was the naturalist from the moment she talked about Sweetheart the snake so that ending had no effect on me whatsoever.

A lot of things happened in this book that were not really necessary or just didn't make sense. Like that little story about Genevieve abusing Katherine over enjoying making poisons. Her goal in life is to become a poisoner so why would Genevieve be upset over it. Or Elizabeth loosing her hand. Mirabella was upset over it for a minute and it had no lasting effect. Or the entire character of Luke, a baker/designer running a bookstore in a fishing town?

There were redundancies in the writing where a character would think the same thing over and over again but in different ways like when you're trying to up the word count of an essay. Other times the characters would be having conversations between themselves and you'd hear what the character was thinking but they wouldn't say it in the conversation yet the other character somehow knew exactly was the character was  referring to.

Personally I felt that Arsinoe was annoying and Katherine was unnaturally oblivious. Mirabella was the only character of any interest to me yet her point of view was the least used. Even then she made obviously stupid mistakes like running away, I understand that that event was needed for the whole Joseph romance but I think it could have been better executed. The romances were cringey and lacking depth.

All of that being said I think I might read the second book in the hopes that it will be better now that Arsinoe is aware of her gift. However I'll go into it with low expectations.

UPDATE
I made it about 3/4 through the next book and just decided that it wasn't worth continuing unfortunately. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Heir of Fire review and discussion

All of the stars because Celaena rattles the stars. Spoiler free review Celaena returns bent and broken but damn she made a speedy recovery. We are introduced to new characters and new plots in this installment of the series. It was formidable. All of it. The writing was amazing, the character development was better than ever and the story is beyond words. I highly highly recommend every book in this series. Novellas and everything. I think it's safe to say that this is my favourite series of all time. I love it even more than The Infernal Devices trilogy. I'm so sorry Will but it's the truth. If I go into any detail at all it will spoil you so I'm just going to leave this hoping that you all get the message. 

In The Afterlight by Alexandra Bracken Review+Discussion

★ ★ ★ I might say 3.5 stars instead. I haven't quite made up my mind about it yet. On it's own it was a good book, but as a conclusion to a wonderful trilogy I was not satisfied. The characters seemed to be going backwards in their character development  at times.  I also didn't like how some problems were resolved as well. I feel like if we got rid of some of the useless scenes in the beginning there would be more time to develop the ending and write an epilogue to clear all the political problems. This book also lacked in humor so if you start reading expecting to have a good time you are going to be disappointed.  It really saddens me to have to write such a negative review when I had such high hopes for this conclusion. 

The Raven King by Maggie Stiefvater Review+Discussion

Loved the book, hated the ending, iffy on Stiefvater's writing style of suggesting things but never explaining or confirming. If she actually writes another trilogy about Ronan anytime soon maybe I'll pick it up. I can't really give an in depth review without spoiling anything as it's the fourth book so you'll just have to take my word on it. Four out of five stars? Spoilers under the cut!